ACE Journal of Neurosciences (ACEJN) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of editorial quality, transparency, and research integrity. The journal's editorial policies are developed in accordance with internationally recognized best practices and the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the editorial standards expected by leading indexing databases.
Editorial decisions are made independently and are based solely on the scientific quality, originality, ethical compliance, methodological rigor, and relevance of the submitted manuscript. Commercial interests, sponsorship, advertising, institutional affiliations, or financial considerations do not influence editorial decisions.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to determine whether it:
Manuscripts that fail to meet these requirements may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected before peer review.
The Editorial Office is responsible for managing the peer-review process from submission to the final editorial decision. Editors assign qualified reviewers with appropriate subject expertise, monitor review timelines, evaluate reviewer reports, and ensure that the review process remains fair, confidential, objective, and free from conflicts of interest.
Editorial decisions are based on:
The final decision to accept, request revisions, or reject a manuscript rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief or the assigned Academic Editor.
Accepted manuscripts undergo professional editorial processing before publication, including:
The Editorial Office is responsible for organizing accepted manuscripts into scheduled issues or continuous publication, ensuring consistency, accuracy, and timely publication. Articles are published only after all editorial, technical, and ethical requirements have been successfully completed.
The Editorial Office provides guidance to authors throughout the publication process, including:
ACEJN is committed to safeguarding research integrity. Editors investigate allegations of:
Where appropriate, the journal may issue corrections, expressions of concern, retractions, or notify relevant institutions in accordance with COPE guidance.
Editors, reviewers, and authors must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest that could influence the editorial or publication process. Individuals with significant conflicts of interest will not participate in the editorial evaluation of the affected manuscript.
All submitted manuscripts, reviewer reports, editorial correspondence, and publication records are treated as confidential and are accessible only to authorized editorial personnel involved in the publication process.
If significant errors or ethical concerns are identified after publication, the journal will publish corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern when necessary, following internationally accepted publication ethics guidelines.
The Editorial Board regularly reviews and updates editorial policies to reflect evolving international publishing standards, ethical recommendations, and best editorial practices.